The English word 'agenda setting' denotes a sociological theory according to which 'exposure to certain priority in the distribution of news by the media frame, and the view of their priorities in the public view'. The agenda setting falls, therefore, in this line of studies i.e, in the sociology of communication that is interested in studying the effects of long-term media on users. This case affirms the correspondence between the importance given to the media and the hierarchy of concerns perceived by users.
[...] (1985) "An authors frame of mind [Review of Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences]" New Ideas in Psychology, 95-100. Sempsey, James, "The Pedagogical Implications Of Cognitive Science and Howard Gardner's M.I. Theory Critique)" Steven A. Stahl "Different Strokes for Different Folks?: A Critique of Learning Styles", American Educator, Fall Sternberg, R. J. (1983, Winter) "How much Gall is too much gall? {Review of Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences}". Contemporary Education Review, 215-224. Sternberg, R. J. [...]
[...] Conclusion If, therefore, to determine what influences what remains efforts in setting agendas empirically that, by the very nature of the report to be deciphered, it is very difficult to achieve the plausibility of the theory of agenda setting can be saved especially if inserted into a larger picture, where the analysis of the effects of media influences interact with other agendas (desires and wishes of the public policy) and where it is precisely this interaction to be the process that shape their agendas. Reference Gardner, Howard, and Seana Moran. (2006). The science of Multiple Intelligences theory: A response to Lynn Waterhouse. Educational Psychologist, Volume 41, Issue Fall 2006, pp. [...]
[...] (2004) Changing minds: The art and science of changing our own and other people's minds. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, p Kavale, Kenneth, A., and Steven R. Forness "Substance over style: Assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching", Exceptional Children 54:228-239. Klein, Perry, D. (1997) "Multiplying the problems of intelligence by eight: A critique of Gardner's theory", Canadian Journal of Education, 377-394. Klein, Perry, D. (1998) response to Howard Gardner: Falsifiability, empirical evidence, and pedagogical usefulness in educational psychology" Canadian Journal of Education, 103-112. [...]
[...] But there are theoretical ambiguities in the approach of the agenda setting. The assumptions underlying agenda setting assumes a linear mechanism of influence from the priorities of the elite politician or lobbyists (who seek to impose competing the salience of their questions) reflected the priorities of the media, and finally, views of the public. Rogers, referring to the three actors, has tried to show the weaknesses of the theory are based on pointing out how some passages not exactly automatic. [...]
[...] The agenda setting: what role does it play? Table of Content i. Abstract ii. Setting the standards iii. Methodical approach iv. Interdependence of political agenda v. Evaluation vi. Conclusion vii. Reference Abstract Analysis of one of the most popular theories on the effects of long-term average over the public. Setting the standards The English word "agenda setting" (setting the agenda) denotes a sociological theory according to which exposure to certain priority in the distribution of news by the media frame the view of events and their priorities in the public's views. [...]
Source aux normes APA
Pour votre bibliographieLecture en ligne
avec notre liseuse dédiée !Contenu vérifié
par notre comité de lecture