art, globalisation, contemporain, artiste, esthétique, philosophes
"Art always has been and always will be important to humans", says Cynthia Freeland, professor of philosophy at the Houston University. This sentence, announced as a universal truth, shows that art remains strongly essential for human beings. It is also assured that everybody knows the importance of art for mankind. For ages, it has been developed, even before written languages. Ancient cave-wall paintings illustrate the importance of creativity or simply of art for human beings. These primitive creations evolved through times, and nowadays, art takes so many forms giving rise to a countless number of questions about art. In considering its evolution and the diversity of ways in which art appears today, the value of art is at the heart of many current debates.
All know that art is vital for mankind, but conceptions, theories, considerations, appreciations, valuations, or simply, the definition alighted on art are strongly different from one person to another. Thus, according to the diversity of artworks existing today and in the face of Progress, we can try to answer the following question : What is art today? Past theories of art are nowadays revisited in the context of Contemporary Art, which has radically transformed art codes. According to William Rubin, director of the Museum of Modern Art in New York, "there is no single definition of art" and the historian, Thomas McEvilley argues that today, "more or less anything can be designated as art". In this way, can anybody today be an artist? Does each work presented as art can be really considered as such? What is an artwork? It seems that focusing on past theories is currently impossible because of the radical evolution of art through times.
Finding a definition for art has always been a crucial problem, as Paul Gauguin tried with his very last essay, "What is Art?". In this book, the artist explains that art refers to something skilfully created by artists. However, artists also require to be defined to understand the value dedicated to art. Nevertheless, these attempts of definitions are limited to a plurality of conceptions, challenging the general public perceptions and philosophers, psychologists and critics' theories.
[...] Retrieved 28, December from http://web.ubc.ca/okanagan/creative/links/arthistory/What_is_Art_.html Plato : Art definition. Retrieved 16, December from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artdefinition/#TraDef Graffiti. Retrieved 18, December from http://www.graffiti.org/faq/graf.def.html Graffiti as an art form. Retrieved 28 December from http://www.artsz.org/graffiti-as-anart-form/ What is art? What is an artist? [...]
[...] Gallimard Arthur C. Danto. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton University Press Linda Nochlin. Realism. Style and civilization. Ed. Penguin Howard Gardner, Philosophy in a New Key R. G. Collingwood. Outlines of a Philosophy of Art. Ed. [...]
[...] I doesn't have to be beautiful or moral. It doesn't have to manifest personal genius or devotion to a god through luminosity, geometry, and allegory (p.58)68. Thus, the ideal recipe for a relevant definition about art seems to be based on the mix between an infinite artistic creation and personal judgments. Contemporary art shows that anything can be art, and this can constitute the major reason of the impossibility to provide it a precise relevant definition. The American writer on art Nancy Aiken simply says that can be made by any of us. [...]
[...] The recent shift to art business enhanced access to art and constitutes now a new source of creation for artists. The evolution of Art thanks to many artists, and progress enhanced by globalization and technologies, radically changed philosophers conceptions of what is art : today art is not just about beauty, aesthetics, taste or quality. Art is nowadays not only referring to beautiful paintings or sculptures anymore, but has to be tied to many artistic forms, cultures, and rules (such as business). [...]
[...] A work is art when somebody is looking at it. Each individual looks at a work in its own, interprets it, or tries to understand it, giving to the artwork a special value and artistic interest. For Kant we label an object beautiful because it promotes an internal harmony or 'free play' of our mental faculties ; we call something 'beautiful' when it elicits this pleasure »(Ibid. p.12) and that for Kant, the aesthetic is experienced when a sensuous object stimulates our emotions, intellect and imagination (Ibid. [...]
Source aux normes APA
Pour votre bibliographieLecture en ligne
avec notre liseuse dédiée !Contenu vérifié
par notre comité de lecture